RE: cross compiler sparc m68k

[David Korn <dkorn at pixelpower dot com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter Barada [mailto:pbarada@mail.wm.sps.mot.com]
>Sent: 11 February 2002 17:26
>To: David Korn
>Cc: Wolfgang.Fritz@datentechnik.com; crossgcc@sources.redhat.com
>Subject: Re: cross compiler sparc m68k
>
>
>
>>  Makes it look like a one-tree build, but without any clashes between
>>different versions of (e.g.) include headers in 
>$newlibsrc/include versus
>>$gccsrc/include.
>
>Hmmm, I wouldn't have expected any clashes bewteen gcc and newlib...
>

  Just for example, the libiberty versions are often not synced.  I did
once try unpacking newlib and gcc into the same top level directory and
got a *nightmare* of clashing headers.

  Search the list archive for those "ln -s" commands and see how often
it's helped in the past before.  I reckon it probably is the missing
step in Bill's FAQ.


     DaveK
-- 
Burn your ID card!  http://www.optional-identity.org.uk/
Help support the campaign, copy this into your .sig!




**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com