This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Cross compile error question: i686 to powerpc--linux-gnu


* William A. Gatliff <bgat@saturn.billgatliff.com> on Wed, Oct 17, 2001:

> 
> Oooh, let's constrain ourselves to the 2.95.x series, ok?  I'm still
> reeling with the differences in 3.x...  :^)

As far as libgcc is conerned, I think the only major change is the ability to
build a shared libgcc.

> 
> I think I'm correct in saying that the "all-gcc" target stops before
> building libiberty, but after building libgcc, no?
> 

Yes, it's best to think of libgcc as being part of the C compiler proper,
but like you stated earlier, it's possible to compile source files even
without libgcc being available (usually system software does this).  It's
even possible to link applications w/out libgcc, as long as your code
doesn't invoke any intrinsics (and that can be pretty difficult to arrange
:).

M. R.

PGP signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]