This is the mail archive of the cgen@sourceware.org mailing list for the CGEN project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
For the record, I agree with you that it's a s-t-r-e-t-c-h.Dave Brolley writes: > >So, uh, why would only parallel CPUs have delay-slots? Or do we > >actually have differing perceptions and definitions of what a > >"delay" is? > > > It's more of an extension of the notion of what parallel is.
What dictionary are you looking in? :-)
> The "new" delay implementation [...].They're not both needed in language terms. Everything can be done using the "new" implementation. I was just thinking that the "old" should still work for legacy code.
> [...]
> I think that if both can be supported then that would be "a good thing > (tm)".
Both what? Maybe you can elaborate on why both are needed
at the rtl level? [I'm thinking in language terms, not implementation.]
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |