This is the mail archive of the cgen@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the CGEN project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch][rfa]@arch@_cgen_ifld_table


Frank Ch. Eigler writes:
 > Approving your patches seems like an unnecessary formality,
 > given your understanding and history.  Does someone see a
 > need to avoid recognizing brolley within the maintainers list?

Since you're asking ...

Yes and no.

Even maintainers need their patches approved, or at least discussed,
if the change is substantial.

As long as there continues to be the proviso that substantial changes
get discussed on the list first, sure.

I realize that may have been implicit.  Just making it explicit.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]