This is the mail archive of the
cgen@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the CGEN project.
Re: [patch][rfa]@arch@_cgen_ifld_table
- From: Doug Evans <dje at transmeta dot com>
- To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Dave Brolley <brolley at redhat dot com>, cgen at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:21:11 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: [patch][rfa]@arch@_cgen_ifld_table
- References: <3E495AD1.7070305@redhat.com><20030211154104.B14524@redhat.com>
Frank Ch. Eigler writes:
> Approving your patches seems like an unnecessary formality,
> given your understanding and history. Does someone see a
> need to avoid recognizing brolley within the maintainers list?
Since you're asking ...
Yes and no.
Even maintainers need their patches approved, or at least discussed,
if the change is substantial.
As long as there continues to be the proviso that substantial changes
get discussed on the list first, sure.
I realize that may have been implicit. Just making it explicit.