Re: CGEN patch: null keywords and very long lines

[Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>]

"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com> writes:
> Looks good to me; go ahead.

Thanks.

> (There is no easy way to get rid of that buffer size limit, eh?)

First instinct was to try.  The most practical way seemed to be to avoid
the copy and pass the length around.  But it didn't fit in well with the
existing code style, so I thought, what's the point in searching for a
256-character keyword anyway?  Just think of it as an optimisation ;-).

Richard