This is the mail archive of the cgen@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the CGEN project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

re: better handling of unknown operands


Ben Elliston writes:
 >   matthew> if you change the assertion to be:
 > 
 >   matthew> 	every format op is either:
 >   matthew> 		- SEM-ONLY, or
 >   matthew> 		- has a matching syntax op, and
 >   matthew> 	every syntax op has matching format op.
 > 
 >   matthew> is there a case that this doesn't work with?  i looked at the current
 >   matthew> cgen input files and none of them appear to use the former currently,
 >   matthew> but it definately should be supported.  i can't think of a case for
 >   matthew> operands used for parsing purposes that don't have format ifields, but
 >   matthew> if there were, you could extend this with a (new? same?) attribute to
 >   matthew> indicate it was such.
 > 
 > Anyone?  Anyone?

I don't quite understand the question.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]