This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: libiberty PATCH to disable demangling of ancient mangling schemes


On 2018-12-14 5:39 p.m., Jason Merrill wrote:
> GDB/binutils folks, how do you want to handle this? Shall I go ahead
> with this patch, with the understanding that there will be associated
> changes necessary when merging it into the binutils-gdb repository, or
> go with the small disabling patch to start with?

Hi Jason

>From the GDB point of view, I don't see any problem.  Please proceed with
the cleanup, it should be quite easy to adjust our code when we sync libiberty.

There is a usage of cplus_mangle_opname in binutils/stabs.c, and I can't
speak for binutils.  But speaking of cplus_mangle_opname, shouldn't you also
remove the declaration in include/demangle.h?

Simon


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]