This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Set DEMANGLE_RECURSION_LIMIT to 1536


On 12/11/2018 02:25 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:05 AM Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:

>> Ian earlier mentioned that we've wanted to avoid malloc because some
>> programs call the demangler from a signal handler, but it seems like
>> we already do, these functions already aren't safe to use from
>> signal handlers as is.  Where does the "we can't use malloc" idea
>> come from?  Is there some entry point that avoids
>> the malloc/realloc/free calls?
> 
> cplus_demangle_v3_callback and cplus_demangle_print_callback.

Ah, gotcha.  Thanks!  Interesting.

Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]