This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v5]

From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, matz at gcc dot gnu dot org, sgayou at redhat dot com, Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 17:07:58 +0000
Subject: Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v5]
References: <87muprdko7.fsf@redhat.com> <20181130084211.GX12380@tucnak> <173817ca-0aa0-e1a2-6725-37e079ead545@redhat.com> <m3woousm8n.fsf@pepe.airs.com> <20181130140330.GA12380@tucnak> <fa1abe9c-7545-6a48-cbf0-97b993345523@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc1gTSXgSiJSFKEWaE0UTGbi45-mWHKJnUb4Wvjp86bbFQ@mail.gmail.com> <460cb971-0e21-1e3e-4920-8b3ee7290cf7@redhat.com> <CAKOQZ8zspME4gzoRw4xgFcShoqeUfp_e=Og=4S-yKn4EehokeA@mail.gmail.com> <736e8303-b724-f96d-54f5-46bff99fa34d@redhat.com> <57d33aa7-4e37-a09c-4bdc-974b5f654d33@redhat.com> <c7c959ca-b8bf-bd3e-a65d-bb274a3118d3@redhat.com>

On 12/04/2018 04:56 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
> 
>> The issue pointed out by
>>
>>  https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg02592.html
>>
>> is still present in this version.
> 
> Doh!  Yes I meant to fix that one too, but forgot.
> 
>> Also, noticed a typo here:
>>
>>> +/* If DMGL_NO_RECURE_LIMIT is not enabled, then this is the value used as
>>
>> Typo: "RECURE"
> 
> Oops - thanks.
> 
> OK, revised (v5) patch attached.  Is this version acceptable to all ?
> 
This is fine with me.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v5]
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v3]
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v3]
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v3]
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor via binutils
- Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v4]
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v4]
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v5]
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]