This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ELF: Group PT_NOTE segments by section alignments

From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 13:54:00 +0930
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ELF: Group PT_NOTE segments by section alignments
References: <20181001185436.21718-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <20181001185436.21718-2-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <cceddb7f-ff65-18a9-ab85-4b99960d9067@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOrwMxUPR_uNc=hnvp++QPo-1yWmO=yidqra874bOwK5Og@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 05:55:19AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> 	PR ld/23658
> 	* elf.c (get_program_header_size): Put all adjacent SHT_NOTE
> 	sections with the same section alignment into a single PT_NOTE
> 	segment.  Check SHT_NOTE section type instead of section name.
> 	(_bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments): Likewise.

This patch caused a PT_NOTE header to be dropped in the following tests:
spu-elf  +FAIL: ld-spu/ovl
spu-elf  +FAIL: ld-spu/ovl2

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] ELF: Group and sort output note sections by section alignments
  - From: H.J. Lu
- [PATCH 1/3] ELF: Group PT_NOTE segments by section alignments
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] ELF: Group PT_NOTE segments by section alignments
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] ELF: Group PT_NOTE segments by section alignments
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]