This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH, RX] Add target rx-*-linux
Hi,
On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 10:39 +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
>
> It standrad linux kernel.
>
> My target is RX62N + 16MByte external memory.
> I think that connecting with a 32 bit bus is not so slow.
The latest RX71/RX65 support 60 MHz 32 bit data external SDRAM. On top
of that, there is no instruction/data cache for external SDRAM. The
system was not designed to operate like that. The primary use case for
RX is to run code from on-chip flash and use on-chip RAM as application
data. Every individual access to external memory by the CPU costs
about 3 bus cycles, from what I can see in the hardware manual...
> Also, since the code size is small, I think the influence of memory
> speed is relaxed.
Even if all the Linux + user application code fits into the on-chip
flash ROM, the problem will be the CPU accessing data in external
memory without cache. That's why I don't think it's practical to run
Linux on RX MCUs. It will run, but there are better embedded Linux
options for the same or lower price as RX MCUs. So I'm not sure how
useful this will be?
>
> I think that it is 10% smaller than other CPUs.
> yo-satoh@yo-satoh-debian:~/linux (rx)$ rx-unknown-linux-size vmlinux
> text data bss dec hex
> filename
> 801156 68556 164568 1034280 fc828
> vmlinux
My observation similar. RX ISA produces slightly smaller code than
other ISAs. But not that much smaller to compensate the slow external
memory :)
Just for my understanding, why is it needed to create a new ELF type
for that? Why can't rx-elf be used as-is?
Cheers,
Oleg