This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, committed] x86: Replace AddrPrefixOp0 with AddrPrefixOpReg

From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich at suse dot com>
To: <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 07:14:15 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH, committed] x86: Replace AddrPrefixOp0 with AddrPrefixOpReg
References: <20180507170054.GA25577@intel.com> <5AF2952A020000780012F68F@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> <CAMe9rOqFVMP7AiefiVt6VacEmW5ekocQSOPfPG2QLeFCxiPaAQ@mail.gmail.com> <5AF2EAB9020000780012F77C@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> <CAMe9rOpAr3T-B+jW10vZmK+yRLE6OZOLktgF2oq4uYuaeJEniQ@mail.gmail.com> <5AF2F2A0020000780012F7D9@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>

>>> "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com> 05/09/18 3:08 PM >>>
>>>> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> 05/09/18 2:45 PM >>>
>>Some instructions with 1 register operand addrprefixopreg doesn't have
>>opcode_modifier.immext.  But they need 0x66 prefix.
>
>Would you mind pointing out at least one example? It looks to me as if they
>all have ImmExt set.

Oh, umonitor is the example, I see.

Jan

References:
- [PATCH, committed] x86: Replace AddrPrefixOp0 with AddrPrefixOpReg
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH, committed] x86: Replace AddrPrefixOp0 with AddrPrefixOpReg
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH, committed] x86: Replace AddrPrefixOp0 with AddrPrefixOpReg
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH, committed] x86: Replace AddrPrefixOp0 with AddrPrefixOpReg
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH, committed] x86: Replace AddrPrefixOp0 with AddrPrefixOpReg
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH, committed] x86: Replace AddrPrefixOp0 with AddrPrefixOpReg
  - From: Jan Beulich

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]