This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Backport 22782 fix to 2.30 branch?

From: "Roland McGrath via binutils" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
To: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Rainer Orth <ro at cebitec dot uni-bielefeld dot de>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 15:36:32 -0700
Subject: Re: Backport 22782 fix to 2.30 branch?
References: <CAB=4xhr6r2_GYfGkNzHy6rNcFEPhCJA=+G-LOvctyKJL-kGR2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOre6rfiV6iJCdr2yonJGHfnLkovEzZ45xiY8giUiCwTyg@mail.gmail.com> <CAB=4xhoMYBzax6hNhFWFukjuerrXMRW3kV=MHURJKJ+Z6HBARA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOoxwSVRwtqgwOn-0yKrzuuNKbsME+4-w7Y6iMR7vgiG+A@mail.gmail.com> <yddr2n6jfvs.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Reply-to: Roland McGrath <mcgrathr at google dot com>

I cherry-picked the three patches to the 2.30 branch, with a little merge
fixup in the last one as Rainer mentioned.  No check failures for
x86_64-elf or x86_64-linux either.
I've committed them to the branch now.

Thanks,
Roland

References:
- Backport 22782 fix to 2.30 branch?
  - From: Roland McGrath via binutils
- Re: Backport 22782 fix to 2.30 branch?
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Backport 22782 fix to 2.30 branch?
  - From: Roland McGrath via binutils
- Re: Backport 22782 fix to 2.30 branch?
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Backport 22782 fix to 2.30 branch?
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]