This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Enable Intel WAITPKG instructions.


On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V
<igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
>> Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 3:50 PM
>> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V <igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com>
>> Cc: Lu, Hongjiu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>; binutils@sourceware.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Enable Intel WAITPKG instructions.
>>
>> >>> On 09.04.18 at 15:41, <igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com> wrote:
>> > Intel has disclosed a set of new instructions for Tremont processor.
>> > The spec is
>> > https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-architecture-instruction-set-
>> extensions-pro
>> > gramming-reference
>> >
>> > This patch enables Intel WAITPKG instructions.
>> >
>> > gas/
>> >     * config/tc-i386.c (cpu_arch): Add WAITPKG.
>> >     (cpu_noarch): Likewise.
>> >     * doc/c-i386.texi: Document WAITPKG.
>> >     * i386/i386.exp: Run WAITPKG tests.
>> >     * testsuite/gas/i386/waitpkg-intel.d: New test.
>> >     * testsuite/gas/i386/waitpkg.d: Likewise.
>> >     * testsuite/gas/i386/waitpkg.s: Likewise.
>> >     * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-waitpkg-intel.d: Likewise.
>> >     * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-waitpkg.d: Likewise.
>> >     * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-waitpkg.s: Likewise.
>> >
>> > opcodes/
>> >     * i386-dis.c (enum): Add PREFIX_MOD_0_0FAE_REG_6,
>> >     PREFIX_MOD_1_0FAE_REG_6.
>> >     * i386-dis-evex.h (prefix_table):
>> >     New instructions (see prefixes above).
>> >     * i386-gen.c (cpu_flag_init): Add WAITPKG.
>> >     (cpu_flags): Likewise.
>> >     * i386-opc.h (enum): Likewise.
>> >     (i386_cpu_flags): Likewise.
>> >     * i386-opc.tbl: Add umonitor, umwait, tpause.
>>
>> I don't think IgnoreSize is necessary anywhere here. While there
>> are many bad examples, I think it would be helpful if we stopped
>> adding unnecessary attributes to new insns. Quite far down on
>> my list of things to change is an item to drop all unnecessary
>> attributes, such that the table isn't any larger (and more difficult
>> to read/inspect) than needed.
>
> Updated patch is attached. Ok for trunk?
>

OK.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]