This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] In x86 -n docs, mention that you need an explicit nop fill byte.

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Jim Wilson <jimw at sifive dot com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:06:12 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] In x86 -n docs, mention that you need an explicit nop fill byte.
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20171122200421.6753-1-jimw@sifive.com> <CAFyWVaaZSegAE4jAk+Y5BYtEjXdw75XM+cDh2N-u_jjpZkWXmw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com> wrote:
>> The testcase HJ added is nice, but I think we should also clarify the
>> documentation as it doesn't have enough info for one to understand what the -n
>> option does
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>>         gas/
>>         PR gas/22464
>>         * doc/c-i386.texi (-n): Clarify docs.
>
> No comments, I went ahead and checked it in.
>

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.

References:
- [PATCH] In x86 -n docs, mention that you need an explicit nop fill byte.
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: [PATCH] In x86 -n docs, mention that you need an explicit nop fill byte.
  - From: Jim Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]