This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR ld/19579/21306 Properly turn common symbol into definition


On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:45:32AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Since common symbols that are turned into definitions don't have the
>> DEF_REGULAR flag set, we need to check ELF_COMMON_DEF_P for common
>> symbols.
>>
>> bfd/
>>
>>       PR ld/19579
>>       PR ld/21306
>>       * elf32-s390.c (elf_s390_finish_dynamic_symbol): Check
>>       ELF_COMMON_DEF_P for common symbols.
>>       * elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_finish_dynamic_symbol): Likewise.
>>       * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_relocate_section): Likewise.
>>       * elflink.c (_bfd_elf_merge_symbol): Revert commits
>>       202ac193bbbecc96a4978d1ac3d17148253f9b01 and
>>       07492f668d2173da7a2bda3707ff0985e0f460b6.
>>
>> ld/
>>
>>       PR ld/19579
>>       PR ld/21306
>>       * testsuite/ld-elf/pr19579a.c (main): Updated.
>
> This is OK.  Thanks for looking at s390 too.  Which other targets do
> you have cross-compilers installed or test natively in order to see
> 19579 failures?  (I'm assuming that's why you made the s390 changes,

19579 test needs a target compiler to compile.  I updated s390
since the s390 code in question is in PR 19579.

> and would like to know the targets that might yet need attention.)
>

It is hard to tell if other targets are affected since we don't need to
check ELF_COMMON_DEF_P everywhere.

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]