This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [committed, PATCH] Check SEC_ALLOC before allocating dynamic relocation


On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 06:44:22PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>       * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_check_relocs): Check SEC_ALLOC before
>>       allocating dynamic relocation.
>>       * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_check_relocs): Likewise.
>
> Why stop at .rela.dyn relocs?  Should references in non-alloc sections
> create plt or got entries?  Or anything else that check_relocs does?
> See the start of elf64-ppc.c check_relocs.
>
>   if (bfd_link_relocatable (info))
>     return TRUE;
>
>   /* Don't do anything special with non-loaded, non-alloced sections.
>      In particular, any relocs in such sections should not affect GOT
>      and PLT reference counting (ie. we don't allow them to create GOT
>      or PLT entries), there's no possibility or desire to optimize TLS
>      relocs, and there's not much point in propagating relocs to shared
>      libs that the dynamic linker won't relocate.  */
>   if ((sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
>     return TRUE;
>

You are right.  This is what I checked in.

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.
---
>From 081b1afe5a8cfa02bf3b3cdefb80c266705c17d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 05:52:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Skip relocations in non-loaded, non-alloced sections

Don't do anything special with non-loaded, non-alloced sections.
In particular, any relocs in such sections should not affect GOT
and PLT reference counting (ie. we don't allow them to create GOT
or PLT entries), there's no possibility or desire to optimize TLS
relocs, and there's not much point in propagating relocs to shared
libs that the dynamic linker won't relocate.

* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_check_relocs): Skip relocations in
non-loaded, non-alloced sections.
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_check_relocs): Likewise.
---
 bfd/ChangeLog      |  6 ++++++
 bfd/elf32-i386.c   | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 bfd/elf64-x86-64.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog
index 344e08b..ad9e027 100644
--- a/bfd/ChangeLog
+++ b/bfd/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2016-06-16  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_check_relocs): Skip relocations in
+ non-loaded, non-alloced sections.
+ * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_check_relocs): Likewise.
+
 2016-06-15  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

  * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_check_relocs): Check SEC_ALLOC before
diff --git a/bfd/elf32-i386.c b/bfd/elf32-i386.c
index 793fb39..a519778 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-i386.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-i386.c
@@ -1846,6 +1846,15 @@ elf_i386_check_relocs (bfd *abfd,
   if (bfd_link_relocatable (info))
     return TRUE;

+  /* Don't do anything special with non-loaded, non-alloced sections.
+     In particular, any relocs in such sections should not affect GOT
+     and PLT reference counting (ie. we don't allow them to create GOT
+     or PLT entries), there's no possibility or desire to optimize TLS
+     relocs, and there's not much point in propagating relocs to shared
+     libs that the dynamic linker won't relocate.  */
+  if ((sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
+    return TRUE;
+
   BFD_ASSERT (is_i386_elf (abfd));

   htab = elf_i386_hash_table (info);
@@ -2202,19 +2211,18 @@ do_size:
      may need to keep relocations for symbols satisfied by a
      dynamic library if we manage to avoid copy relocs for the
      symbol.  */
-  if ((sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0
-      && ((bfd_link_pic (info)
-   && (r_type != R_386_PC32
-       || (h != NULL
-   && (! (bfd_link_pie (info)
-  || SYMBOLIC_BIND (info, h))
-       || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak
-       || !h->def_regular))))
-  || (ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
-      && !bfd_link_pic (info)
-      && h != NULL
-      && (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak
-  || !h->def_regular))))
+  if ((bfd_link_pic (info)
+       && (r_type != R_386_PC32
+   || (h != NULL
+       && (! (bfd_link_pie (info)
+      || SYMBOLIC_BIND (info, h))
+   || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak
+   || !h->def_regular))))
+      || (ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
+  && !bfd_link_pic (info)
+  && h != NULL
+  && (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak
+      || !h->def_regular)))
     {
       struct elf_dyn_relocs *p;
       struct elf_dyn_relocs **head;
diff --git a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
index 8c8bcce..9044aab 100644
--- a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
+++ b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
@@ -2143,6 +2143,15 @@ elf_x86_64_check_relocs (bfd *abfd, struct
bfd_link_info *info,
   if (bfd_link_relocatable (info))
     return TRUE;

+  /* Don't do anything special with non-loaded, non-alloced sections.
+     In particular, any relocs in such sections should not affect GOT
+     and PLT reference counting (ie. we don't allow them to create GOT
+     or PLT entries), there's no possibility or desire to optimize TLS
+     relocs, and there's not much point in propagating relocs to shared
+     libs that the dynamic linker won't relocate.  */
+  if ((sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) == 0)
+    return TRUE;
+
   BFD_ASSERT (is_x86_64_elf (abfd));

   htab = elf_x86_64_hash_table (info);
@@ -2518,8 +2527,7 @@ elf_x86_64_check_relocs (bfd *abfd, struct
bfd_link_info *info,
       && h != NULL
       && !h->def_regular
       && h->def_dynamic
-      && (sec->flags & SEC_READONLY) == 0))
-      && (sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0)
+      && (sec->flags & SEC_READONLY) == 0)))
     return elf_x86_64_need_pic (abfd, sec, h, symtab_hdr, isym,
  &x86_64_elf_howto_table[r_type]);
   /* Fall through.  */
@@ -2601,19 +2609,18 @@ do_size:
      may need to keep relocations for symbols satisfied by a
      dynamic library if we manage to avoid copy relocs for the
      symbol.  */
-  if ((sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0
-      && ((bfd_link_pic (info)
-   && (! IS_X86_64_PCREL_TYPE (r_type)
-       || (h != NULL
-   && (! (bfd_link_pie (info)
-  || SYMBOLIC_BIND (info, h))
-       || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak
-       || !h->def_regular))))
-  || (ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
-      && !bfd_link_pic (info)
-      && h != NULL
-      && (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak
-  || !h->def_regular))))
+  if ((bfd_link_pic (info)
+       && (! IS_X86_64_PCREL_TYPE (r_type)
+   || (h != NULL
+       && (! (bfd_link_pie (info)
+      || SYMBOLIC_BIND (info, h))
+   || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak
+   || !h->def_regular))))
+      || (ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
+  && !bfd_link_pic (info)
+  && h != NULL
+  && (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak
+      || !h->def_regular)))
     {
       struct elf_dyn_relocs *p;
       struct elf_dyn_relocs **head;
-- 
2.5.5


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]