This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH ARC 1/5]: Dynamic relocs verification for dynindx == -1


Hi all,

Please review.
This patch strengths verification that no dynamic relocation is
generated with an invalid symbol.

Best regards,
Cupertino

bfd/ChangeLog:

Cupertino Miranda  <cmiranda@synopsys.com>
    elf32-arc.c (name_for_global_symbol): Added assert to check for
    symbol index.
    (elf_arc_relocate_section): Added and changed asserts, validating
    the synamic symbol index.
    (elf_arc_finish_dynamic_symbol): Do not fill the dynamic relocation
    if symbol has dynindx set to -1.

From a14d7db2d222b58eb37b670026a9ac83934033d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cupertino Miranda <Cupertino.Miranda@synopsys.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:08:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] STAR 9001011480: Dynamic reloc symbols issue.

Dynamic reloc symbols were set with index -1.
---
 bfd/elf32-arc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bfd/elf32-arc.c b/bfd/elf32-arc.c
index 488b86f..e9fda51 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-arc.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-arc.c
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ name_for_global_symbol (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h)
     _rel.r_addend = ADDEND;						\
     _rel.r_offset = (_htab->s##SECTION)->output_section->vma		\
       + (_htab->s##SECTION)->output_offset + OFFSET;			\
+    BFD_ASSERT (SYM_IDX != -1);						\
     _rel.r_info = ELF32_R_INFO (SYM_IDX, TYPE);				\
     bfd_elf32_swap_reloca_out (BFD, &_rel, _loc);			\
   }
@@ -1495,11 +1496,13 @@ elf_arc_relocate_section (bfd *		   output_bfd,
 		else if (r_type == R_ARC_PC32
 			 || r_type == R_ARC_32_PCREL)
 		  {
-		    BFD_ASSERT (h != NULL && h->dynindx != -1);
+		    BFD_ASSERT (h != NULL);
 		    if ((input_section->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0)
 		      relocate = FALSE;
 		    else
 		      relocate = TRUE;
+
+		    BFD_ASSERT (h->dynindx != -1);
 		    outrel.r_info = ELF32_R_INFO (h->dynindx, r_type);
 		  }
 		else
@@ -1535,6 +1538,8 @@ elf_arc_relocate_section (bfd *		   output_bfd,
 			  relocate = FALSE;
 			else
 			  relocate = TRUE;
+
+			BFD_ASSERT (h->dynindx != -1);
 			outrel.r_info = ELF32_R_INFO (h->dynindx, R_ARC_32);
 		      }
 		  }
@@ -2001,6 +2006,8 @@ GOT_ENTRY_OFFSET = 0x%x, GOT_ENTRY_VMA = 0x%x, for symbol %s\n",
 		    + htab->sgotplt->output_offset
 		    + got_offset);
     rel.r_addend = 0;
+
+    BFD_ASSERT (h->dynindx != -1);
     rel.r_info = ELF32_R_INFO (h->dynindx, R_ARC_JMP_SLOT);
 
     loc = htab->srelplt->contents;
@@ -2199,7 +2206,10 @@ elf_arc_finish_dynamic_symbol (bfd * output_bfd,
 		{
 		  ADD_RELA (output_bfd, got, got_offset, 0, R_ARC_RELATIVE, 0);
 		}
-	      else
+	      /* Do not fully understand the side effects of this condition.
+		 The relocation space might still being reserved.  Perhaps
+		 I should clear its value.  */
+	      else if (h->dynindx != -1)
 		{
 		  ADD_RELA (output_bfd, got, got_offset, h->dynindx,
 			  R_ARC_GLOB_DAT, 0);
@@ -2274,6 +2284,8 @@ GOT_OFFSET = 0x%x, GOT_VMA = 0x%x, INDEX = %d, ADDEND = 0x%x\n",
       Elf_Internal_Rela rel;
       rel.r_addend = 0;
       rel.r_offset = rel_offset;
+
+      BFD_ASSERT (h->dynindx != -1);
       rel.r_info = ELF32_R_INFO (h->dynindx, R_ARC_COPY);
 
       bfd_elf32_swap_reloca_out (output_bfd, &rel, loc);
-- 
1.9.1


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]