This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: cross-compiling LM32 internal error while linking
- From: Federico Vaga <federico dot vaga at gmail dot com>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jon Beniston <jon at beniston dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:39:25 +0100
- Subject: Re: cross-compiling LM32 internal error while linking
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20160205173045 dot GD8955 at pcbe13110 dot cern dot ch> <20160209162558 dot GU9602 at pcbe13110 dot cern dot ch> <56C20E63 dot 3010300 at redhat dot com> <038601d1689e$93ed29d0$bbc77d70$ at beniston dot com> <20160216154831 dot GA32130 at localhost dot localdomain> <20160217215124 dot GD13894 at localhost dot localdomain> <20160226132826 dot GA11938 at localhost dot localdomain> <01fc01d1709a$022b1f30$06815d90$ at beniston dot com> <20160226133839 dot GB2400 at localhost dot localdomain> <56D0867D dot 4050907 at redhat dot com>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:08:13PM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Federico,
Is there any particular reason why you want/need to use that option? Can't
say I've ever tried it.
There is not. Indeed, I'm not using it anymore. But I think it should not
happen, right?
True - although it is hard to see how this option should be influencing the creation
of LM32 binary files. Unless ... if you have a shared libbfd installed and that is
being used in preference to the bfd library from the 2.26 sources, then that might
explain the problems....
I just checked and yes, I have that shared library installed. I can try to
recompile the toolchain without that library. Do you think it may help?