This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: optimization by as


> On Aug 17, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Yury Gribov <y.gribov@samsung.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 08/10/2015 05:53 PM, Paul_Koning@Dell.com wrote:
>> 
>>> On Aug 10, 2015, at 2:41 AM, Virendra Kumar Pathak <kumarvir.pathak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>> 
>>> What other types of optimization can be handled by the assembler ?
>>> Are they capable of re-ordering the instructions ?
>>> For example inserting other instruction between two loads (on machine
>>> with one load unit) to avoid pipeline stall.
>> 
>> Good assemblers donât do optimization; that is the job of the compiler (or, in the uncommon case of hand-written assembly language, the programmer).  The MIPS assembler is an aberration, fortunately a rare one.  Note that this âoptimizationâ machinery is turned off by recent compilers when they feed generated code to the assembler, because it gets in the way of the compiler doing a better job.
> 
> AFAIR PS3 assembler was also optimizing (e.g. it could do register allocation and instruction scheduling).


There was a high level assembler for the cell processor. But it did not produce binaries from it but rather only produce assembly files which the standard assembler then assemble. I produced the testcase for it while I was at Sony. 

Thanks,
Andrew

> 
> -Y


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]