This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH 0/8] PR ld/17878: Add and use bfd_maybe_object_p
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 03:58:20 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PR ld/17878: Add and use bfd_maybe_object_p
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150205135202 dot GA27146 at gmail dot com> <A129FA6D-12B2-4C9D-8F8B-D4859A4BF643 at adacore dot com>
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05 Feb 2015, at 14:52, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tests are added to verify if nm, ar and ld can properly handle LTO IR
>> stored in plain text file.
>
>> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in elf64-ia64-vms.c
>> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in vms-alpha.c
>> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in vms-lib.c
>> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in xcofflink.c
>> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in ecoff.c
>> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in coff-rs6000.c
>
> None of these formats supports LTO (even less LLVM LTO), so I
> assume they were modified for uniformity, right ?
Yes. That is why I put them in separate patches.
--
H.J.