This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: nm test.o: (g++, cmath, exp, expf)
- From: Reza Roboubi <rezarob at gmail dot com>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:25:06 -0700
- Subject: Re: nm test.o: (g++, cmath, exp, expf)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAA51LV5hS8UJdpC4L0hFbEufhDOn9ejEGw2FgTTXu-VCEDiXHA at mail dot gmail dot com> <5245404B dot 7020309 at redhat dot com> <CAA51LV7otdzhJ8w-VKjBCXPVY5Otmd+Z_F2DivEgf2Zru7tQug at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130929040630 dot GA26564 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org> <CAA51LV4uie3j=_EsAOiwm42QUoq1SD=fkA4AHySAoc1nBYG0xw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130929143144 dot GB26564 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org>
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, I see. You missed a "using namespace std;" in your testcase, or
> neglected to write std::exp(). There is a difference between plain
> exp() and std::exp().
>
> --
> Alan Modra
> Australia Development Lab, IBM
Alan, THANK YOU! hmm...
<Off-topic>
Where does the standard say that? C++ is very convoluted!:(
</Off-topic>
Reza.
- References:
- nm test.o: (g++, cmath, exp, expf)
- Re: nm test.o: (g++, cmath, exp, expf)
- Re: nm test.o: (g++, cmath, exp, expf)
- Re: nm test.o: (g++, cmath, exp, expf)
- Re: nm test.o: (g++, cmath, exp, expf)
- Re: nm test.o: (g++, cmath, exp, expf)