This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCHv2, ARM] Fix handling of GOT and PLT access to IFUNC symbols


On May 28, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 29 April 2013 15:36, Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 29 April 2013 10:51, Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 26 April 2013 09:59, Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org> writes:
>>>>> bfd/ChangeLog:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2013-04-24  Will Newton  <will.newton@linaro.org>
>>>>> 
>>>>>      * elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_populate_plt_entry): Call
>>>>>      elf32_arm_add_dynreloc when emitting R_ARM_IRELATIVE relocs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ld/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2013-04-24  Will Newton  <will.newton@linaro.org>
>>>>> 
>>>>>      * ld-arm/arm-elf.exp: Add IFUNC test 17.
>>>>>      * ld-arm/ifunc-17.dd: New file.
>>>>>      * ld-arm/ifunc-17.gd: Likewise.
>>>>>      * ld-arm/ifunc-17.rd: Likewise.
>>>>>      * ld-arm/ifunc-17.s: Likweise.
>>>>>      * ld-arm/ifunc-1.rd: Reorder relocs to match linker output.
>>>>>      * ld-arm/ifunc-2.rd: Likewise.
>>>>>      * ld-arm/ifunc-5.rd: Likewise.
>>>>>      * ld-arm/ifunc-6.rd: Likewise.
>>>> 
>>>> Looks good, thanks.  OK if no ARM maintainer objects in 48 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks, applied.
>> 
>> Tristan, is this ok for the 2.23 branch?
> 
> Ping?
> 
> Is this patch (and the follow-up that fixes the arm-eabi testsuite
> failure) ok for the 2.23 branch?

Yes, this is OK for 2.23 (although I am not sure there will be a new 2.23 release)

Tristan.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]