This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Mach-O: Follow Apple's dSYM files

From: shinichiro hamaji <shinichiro dot hamaji at gmail dot com>
To: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
Cc: binutils Development <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:37:41 +0900
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mach-O: Follow Apple's dSYM files
References: <CALOyH=+5DQEPLTYyXWO3ur3xTXpM+gaTegJD9q8SgW4-ZdaZKA@mail.gmail.com> <AEB0976A-AC7B-4CAD-9305-68C1B4B2BF00@adacore.com> <CALOyH=J5D=BKxxb1B5FjOAeWZTPxErxeDe41z8R7EuPu5EG4hQ@mail.gmail.com> <7ACD475E-6FA1-4226-A0EF-2CB5722491F4@adacore.com>

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 2, 2012, at 7:45 PM, shinichiro hamaji wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the review! I feel my patch is much better than before.
>> Here is the updated patch: http://shinh.skr.jp/t/dsym3.patch
>>
>> Some replies for comments will be inlined.
>
> Ok for me. ?You still need to get the approval for the change in non mach-o files.

Thanks! I'll wait for review from global maintainers.

>
> The latest step is to implement find_nearest_line when there is no dsym file !

Like Apple's GDB which follows individual objects? Yeah, the change
would be a lot more involved...

Thanks!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Mach-O: Follow Apple's dSYM files
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: [PATCH] Mach-O: Follow Apple's dSYM files
  - From: Tristan Gingold

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Mach-O: Follow Apple's dSYM files
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: [PATCH] Mach-O: Follow Apple's dSYM files
  - From: shinichiro hamaji
- Re: [PATCH] Mach-O: Follow Apple's dSYM files
  - From: Tristan Gingold

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]