This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patching autoconf to support static binutils?

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: binutils at sourceware dot org
Cc: Bryan Ischo <bryan at ischo dot com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:25:39 -0400
Subject: Re: Patching autoconf to support static binutils?
References: <4E52CCCF.7080009@ischo.com> <4E542A60.7010104@ischo.com>

On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 18:32:00 Bryan Ischo wrote:
> On 08/22/11 14:40, Bryan Ischo wrote:
> > Hello.  I am trying to figure out how to build a statically linked
> > version of binutils (starting with binutils source version 2.21.1).  I
> > have found some old discussions of this topic via search results, but
> > there was never any real resolution to this issue as far as I can tell.
> 
> Hello out there ... is anyone steering this ship????

wow, 24 hours w/out a response and you're already getting punchy ?  this is 
open source which means you get to figure things out yourself if you cant find 
help.  not bug people even more for their free assistance.

./configure
make configure-host
make LDFLAGS=-all-static
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patching autoconf to support static binutils?
  - From: Bryan Ischo

References:
- Patching autoconf to support static binutils?
  - From: Bryan Ischo
- Re: Patching autoconf to support static binutils?
  - From: Bryan Ischo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]