This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils prerequisites (recent zlib version - what else?)
ohh silly me, sorry, I sent my reply to the wrong list :-(
I'm trying again:
>> I noticed that gcc has an option `--with-system-zlib', so in
>> total I would need --with-system-zlib=no, but if I understand
>> correctly this is not supported by binutil/bfd.
>> Did I understand correctly?
> Unrecognized --with options are ignored.
Yes, I know this from autoconf.
> The difference in the options
> is because for gcc, zlib is not optional when building libjava. For the
> binutils zlib is always optional.
so gcc can be built against its own zlib which is included in gcc source
but binutils cannot?
I though it could be possible to force to use the own zlib, which seems
to be impossible.
anyway, I don't need Java ATM.
Thanks for your quick replies and help,
---------- End of Forwarded message from ----------
From: Steffen Dettmer <email@example.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: binutils prerequisites (recent zlib version - what else?)
To: Ian Lance Taylor <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: gcc-help <email@example.com>