This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH]Add support for Open8 configuration to config.sub (from config.git)
Exactly - I approached Ben Elliston with a requested patch to config.sub, and it
I searched the binutils archives for the instance of "an upstream commit of
config.sub by someone who lacks check-in privileges", and missed it, if it
Given that I don't have checkin privileges (nor should I), I made a guess that
submitting the change as a patch was the most correct approach.
I'm not complaining, mind you.Â There seems to be a great deal of "assumed
knowledge" on how to interact with the list - so far, I seem to have
(regrettably) made every mistake that can be made.
Looking through the MAINTAINERS file gives some global context - is there more
extensive documentation, perhaps a wiki that I've missed, that gives more of the
I've really gotten off on the wrong foot, here, and all I'm trying to accomplish
is to contribute my binutils port for the Open8, so I can move on to finishing
my gcc port.
Truly, I wish to conform to the recognized protocols - can someone mentor me,
off list, please?
Also, I apologize for the clutter I've injected through my attempts.
On April 4, 2011 at 9:05 AM Hans-Peter Nilsson <email@example.com> wrote:
> Re subject, you mean like it's committed in the upstream
> config sources?
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Kirk Hays wrote:
> > 2011-04-01Â Kirk HaysÂ <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >Â Â Â Â Â* config.sub: From config.git: Add configuration support for Open8
> >Â Â Â Â ÂMCU softcore.
> If so, then this should be something like "Update from upstream
> sources." as you can see for previous imports. ;)
> (And it should be a full update, not just a patch for your port;
> I don't know if that's what's going on.)
> When the changelog instead mentions the specific change, it
> looks like a manual patch which is usually due to a
> misunderstanding of the process, but we've been over that.
> brgds, H-P