This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 01:46:42 H.J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > "H.J. Lu" writes: > >>> It's quite likely that I misunderstand. It sounds like you are saying > >>> that it's OK for GNU ld to segfault when building an older version of > >> > >> Linker doesn't segfault. > >> > >>> glibc. The linker isn't like the compiler, where we tighten > >>> restrictions on the input language. The linker should accept old > >>> object files. And of course it should never segfault. But if I > >>> misunderstand, then I apologize for raising the issue. > >> > >> The problem is the linker generates bad libc.so with unfixed glibc. > >> The fix is trivial and leads to slightly better libc.so as extra bonus. > > > > Thanks for the correction, but that's sort of worse. > > It happens at build-time and build won't finish. assuming native build. a cross-build wont have a clue. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |