This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: src bfd/ChangeLog bfd/archive.c bfd/bfd-in2.h ...

From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas at schwinge dot name>
To: "H\.J\. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, "Joseph S\. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 09:31:00 +0100
Subject: Re: src bfd/ChangeLog bfd/archive.c bfd/bfd-in2.h ...
References: <20101029121039.19742.qmail@sourceware.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010291609140.21742@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <AANLkTim_Jvm_mo5XtBBrvRctHu0bD4C_mHmQB7LcrofG@mail.gmail.com> <20101029183940.GA16242@dirichlet.schwinge.homeip.net> <20101102021501.GG26513@bubble.grove.modra.org>

Hello!

On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 12:45:01PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:39:40PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Hrm, in which way is this test specific to a Linux target?
> 
> In which way are you worse off than before HJ added this test?

We're not.  In relation to my ``[PATCH] Improve binutils testsuite
coverage for GNU/Hurd (and kFreeBSD?)'', I was just pointing out that
this is not a proper solution in my opinion: support for -shared is not
Linux-specific.  (But probably nobody is interested in solving this
properly.)

Regards,
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References:
- Re: src bfd/ChangeLog bfd/archive.c bfd/bfd-in2.h ...
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]