This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [patch x64 SEH]: Sort pdata section ascending
On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:06 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 14/09/2010 19:23, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 09/14/2010 10:18 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>
>>> + bfd_vma vl, vr;
>>> + vl = bfd_getl32 (lp); vr = bfd_getl32 (rp);
>>> + if (vl != vr)
>>> + return (vl < vr ? -1 : 1);
>>> + vl = bfd_getl32 (lp + 4); vr = bfd_getl32 (rp + 4);
>>> + if (vl != vr)
>>> + return (vl < vr ? -1 : 1);
>>> + vl = bfd_getl32 (lp + 8); vr = bfd_getl32 (rp + 8);
>>> + if (vl != vr)
>>> + return (vl < vr ? -1 : 1);
>>> + return 0;
>>
>> Isn't the start address the only thing that matters here?
>> We really shouldn't have overlapping entries. Certainly
>> the pointer into the .xdata section should not be included
>> in the sort order; that's totally irrelevant.
>
> BTW, are we OK with requiring GCC to build binutils, or is the code meant to
> be ANSI compatible? I can't remember where this is documented.
Please, stay with ISO-C 90.
Tristan.