This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2_20 0/3] ld: Fix -no-add-needed vs weak for binutils-2_20-branch

From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
Cc: Kirill Smelkov <kirr at landau dot phys dot spbu dot ru>, binutils at sourceware dot org, Roland McGrath <roland at frob dot com>, 591405 at bugs dot debian dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:13:14 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2_20 0/3] ld: Fix -no-add-needed vs weak for binutils-2_20-branch
References: <cover.1281189992.git.kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru> <20100823081118.GA6740@landau.phys.spbu.ru> <2E0B44B3-B76D-400A-AF18-E662F7DFAAFA@adacore.com> <20100823131211.GA13030@landau.phys.spbu.ru> <4C77AB13.9060403@redhat.com>

On Aug 27, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:

> Hi Kirill, Hi Tristan,
> 
>>> This is OK to apply to the branch.  Can you do it ?
>> I'm afraid no, because I have no commit rights to binutils CVS.
> 
> I have now checked the patches in to the branch.

Ah thanks.  I was planning to do this next week.

Tristan.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2_20 0/3] ld: Fix -no-add-needed vs weak for binutils-2_20-branch
  - From: Kirill Smelkov

References:
- [PATCH 2_20 0/3] ld: Fix -no-add-needed vs weak for binutils-2_20-branch
  - From: Kirill Smelkov
- Re: [PATCH 2_20 0/3] ld: Fix -no-add-needed vs weak for binutils-2_20-branch
  - From: Kirill Smelkov
- Re: [PATCH 2_20 0/3] ld: Fix -no-add-needed vs weak for binutils-2_20-branch
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: [PATCH 2_20 0/3] ld: Fix -no-add-needed vs weak for binutils-2_20-branch
  - From: Kirill Smelkov
- Re: [PATCH 2_20 0/3] ld: Fix -no-add-needed vs weak for binutils-2_20-branch
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]