This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] add amdfam15 flag
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:56 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Quentin Neill
> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Resubmitting this patch which adds support for -mtune=amdfam15, this
>> time with test cases.
>>
>> Tested with "make -k check".
>>
>> Okay to commit?
>>
>> gas/
>> ? ? ? ?* config/tc-i386.c (cpu_arch): Add amdfam15.
>> ? ? ? ? ?(i386_align_code): Add PROCESSOR_AMDFAM15 cases.
>> ? ? ? ?* config/tc-i386.h (processor_type): Add PROCESSOR_AMDFAM15.
>> ? ? ? ?* doc/c-i386.texi: Add amdfam15.
>>
>> opcodes/
>> ? ? ? ?* i386-gen.c (cpu_flag_init): Add new CPU_AMDFAM15_FLAGS.
>> ? ? ? ?* i386-init.h: Regenerated.
>>
>> testsuite/
>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/i386.exp: Add new amdfam15 test cases.
>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/amdfam15.d: New.
>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/amdfam15.s: New.
>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/nops-1-amdfam15.d: New.
>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/x86-64-amdfam15.d: New.
>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/x86-64-amdfam15.s: New.
>> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/x86-64-nops-1-amdfam15.d: New.
>>
>> --
>> Quentin
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Quentin Neill
>> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for -mtune=amdfam15 to gas.
>>>
>>> Tested with "make -k check".
>>>
>>> Okay to commit?
>>>
>>> ??????? * gas/config/tc-i386.c (cpu_arch): Add amdfam15.
>>> ????????? (i386_align_code): Add PROCESSOR_AMDFAM15 cases.
>>> ??????? * gas/config/tc-i386.h (processor_type): Add PROCESSOR_AMDFAM15.
>>> ??????? * gas/doc/c-i386.texi: Add amdfam15.
>>> ??????? * opcodes/i386-gen.c (cpu_flag_init): Add new CPU_AMDFAM15_FLAGS.
>>> ??????? * opcodes/i386-init.h: Regenerated.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Quentin Neill
>>>
>>
>
> Do
>
> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/amdfam15.d: New.
> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/amdfam15.s: New.
> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/x86-64-amdfam15.d: New.
> ? ? ? ?* gas/i386/x86-64-amdfam15.s: New.
>
> add anything which aren't tested before?
> --
> H.J.
I did a search on the mnemonics; no they don't add any new
instructions that aren't in *xop.s and x86-64-fma4.s;
But they do cover every type of operand in each position in both intel
and gas syntax, so there is some value in them.
--
Quentin