This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Need help with gas directive .cfi_sections

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Sharyathi Nagesh <sharyath at in dot ibm dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, jakub at redhat dot com, Mohan Kumar M <mohan at in dot ibm dot com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:42:47 -0500
Subject: Re: Need help with gas directive .cfi_sections
References: <4B055EFF.2080701@in.ibm.com> <20091120035018.GA21033@caradoc.them.org> <4B06E08D.7080308@in.ibm.com>

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:01:41AM +0530, Sharyathi Nagesh wrote:
> 2. Completely relying on .eh_frame, with bp register, for unwinding
> is not suggested as kernel code optimizes out bp register and
> following Intel ABI verbatim wont be possible.

You're confused.  .eh_frame has nothing to do with the frame pointer.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- Need help with gas directive .cfi_sections
  - From: Sharyathi Nagesh
- Re: Need help with gas directive .cfi_sections
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Need help with gas directive .cfi_sections
  - From: Sharyathi Nagesh

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]