This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils 2.20 regressions (20090930)
Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Sep 30, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Tristan Gingold wrote:
Hi,
after the recent commits, I did a new batch of check. See the
results below.
Unless I am wrong I don't see anything blocking. I plan to do the
2.20 release this week (after the PE
linker fix).
Will Alan's fix for the powerpc-rtems failures be included?
No. AFAIK they are not yet committed on mainline. Did you run the
testsuite with them ?
Just did. Unfortunately, I still see the failures. Alan..?
The report is below my signature
I suspect
it will also knock out some of the m32c failures.
What does the mips jal failure indicate? Is that serious?
I haven't investigated that. It doesn't appear on mips-elf.
Alan said privately that some of my failures only showed
up because I also have the target gcc installed.
Tristan.
--joel
=================================
arm-rtems4.10 has 3 failures.
FAIL: bl local instructions for v4t.
FAIL: Local BLX instructions
FAIL: ARM Mapping Symbols for .short (ELF version)
avr-rtems4.10 has 1 failure.
FAIL: S-records
bfin-rtems4.10 has no failures.
h8300-rtems4.10 has no failures.
i386-rtems4.10 has no failures.
lm32-rtems4.10 has no failures.
m32c-rtems4.10 has 8 failures.
FAIL: Check --gc-section
FAIL: Check --gc-section/-q
FAIL: NOCROSSREFS 3
FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-2a
FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-2b
FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-3a
FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-3b
FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-3c
m32r-rtems4.10 has no failures.
m68k-rtems4.10 has no failures.
mips-rtems4.10 has 1 failure.
FAIL: MIPS jal
powerpc-rtems4.10 has 4 failures.
FAIL: Check --gc-section
FAIL: Check --gc-section/-q
FAIL: S-records
FAIL: S-records with constructors
sh-rtems4.10 has no failures.
sparc-rtems4.10 has no failures.
=====================================