This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: bogus "ignoring changed section type" warning


On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:35:58PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Isn't this warning rather odd for code like this:
> 
> 	.section	.init.rodata,"a"
> 	.section	.init.rodata,"a",@progbits
> 
> especially since with just the first directive, the section ends up being
> progbits anyway (due to elf_fake_sections() deriving the type from the
> section flags)?

Yes, there ought to be a warning on the first directive rather than on
the second one.

> Wouldn't it hence make sense to guess an unspecified
> section type from the flags right away,

Probably.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]