This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: RFA: broken strip/objcopy
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2009/4/26 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>:
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 2009/4/25 Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com>:
>>>> H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Dave Korn
>>>>>> ?I'm still unhappy with the architecture of the whole thing. ?It is bad
>>>>>> enough for binutils to reach into bfd and twiddle its private bits, now bfd is
>>>>>> predicating its behaviour on the usage patterns of one specific client,
>>>>>> binutils. ?However, I see that it's not without precedent, as ld/ also does this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not happy the whole PE/COFF in BFD.
>>>>
>>>> ?All the more reason not to add further kludges, if we can't go forwards we
>>>> should at least try to avoid getting deeper in a mess.
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I don't have time for this.
>>>>
>>>> ?Oh well, we'll just have to pile it on the to-do list.
>>>>
>>>> ? ?cheers,
>>>> ? ? ?DaveK
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello guys,
>>>
>>> really, I would be interested in a fix of that, as I assume Dave is
>>> too. This patch breaks our current toolchain and so I would like so a
>>> working patch for all PE-Coff targets, or that we revert the patch and
>>> wait until it is in more common better shape.
>>>
>>
>> Can you try:
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-04/msg00364.html
>
> Hello HJ,
>
> yes this patch fixes it. I tested it for cygwin and mingw-w64 (multilib)
>
I checked in it. Sorry for the breakage.
--
H.J.