This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA:] In bfd_assert at the end, call _exit (EXIT_FAILURE)

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
Cc: drow at false dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:15:22 +1030
Subject: Re: [RFA:] In bfd_assert at the end, call _exit (EXIT_FAILURE)
References: <20090323145608.GA1886@caradoc.them.org> <200903231524.n2NFOV18027354@ignucius.se.axis.com>

Why have bfd_assert if it behaves like _bfd_abort?  I'd rather see
occurrences of BFD_ASSERT changed to calls to abort, if so doing makes
sense on a case by case basis.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA:] In bfd_assert at the end, call _exit (EXIT_FAILURE)
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

References:
- Re: [RFA:] In bfd_assert at the end, call _exit (EXIT_FAILURE)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFA:] In bfd_assert at the end, call _exit (EXIT_FAILURE)
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]