This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] enhance register parsing in .cfi_* handling (v2)


On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:10:45PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >The old assembler uses the same register syntax in .cfi_* directives
> >as in normal instructions. The new one allows naked registers
> >unconditionally.  I think .cfi_* directives should be consistent
> >with instructions.
> 
> I definitely disagree, and you can check that Linux actually uses naked
> registers as .cfi_* arguments, but uses normal AT&T syntax everywhere
> else. The code could have been simpler if I didn't need to cover that
> case.
 
The x86 part is OK.

Thanks.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]