This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Should the section address be ignored when processing DWARF information ?



Does Mach-O need to have the section address added in to the offset calculation when processing DWARF information ?

Right now dwarf information is only used in object files which are a single "section", that then the actual sections are offsets within that so unfortunately, yes, it needs the section address added into the offset calculation when processing dwarf in object files. Out of curiosity what is the section offset in the coff/pe files? I would think it would be something similar...


-eric


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]