This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Replace rex64XYZ with rex.WRXB

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich at novell dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 06:04:11 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: Replace rex64XYZ with rex.WRXB
References: <20070321193838.GA1004@lucon.org> <20070321212039.GB1498@lucon.org> <20070322193509.GA25645@lucon.org> <460394C9.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>

On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:50:17AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >BTW, will '.' in mnemonic be a problem?
> 
> The only thing I'm afraid of here (but that applied already when . was added
> to identifier_chars) is that in Intel syntax, . is an operator (although I think
> the support for this is currently at best partly working).

Do we have some testcases?



H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Replace rex64XYZ with rex.WRXB
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- Why does x86 binutils use REX_MODE64/REX_EXTX/REX_EXTY/REX_EXTZ?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- PATCH: Replace REX_MODE64/REX_EXTX/REX_EXTY/REX_EXTZ with REX_W/REX_R/REX_X/REX_B
  - From: H. J. Lu
- PATCH: Replace rex64XYZ with rex.WRXB
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Replace rex64XYZ with rex.WRXB
  - From: Jan Beulich

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]