This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch][rfc] Complex Relocations gas and bfd

Alan Modra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:40:46PM -0500, Dave Brolley wrote:
If you're trying to tell me that 0xff|255 is not a good value then I can change that as well.

Yes, that's exactly what I was (cryptically) saying. Existing object
files for these targets may already be using 255. The following
appear to be available according to my scan over include/elf/*.h: 142,
143, 152, 155, 156, 157, 159, 197, 198, 199, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206,
207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 217, 218, 225, 226.
Perhaps it might be better to define the reloc on a target by target
I've spent about a day and a half now trying to find a way to define the reloc on a target by target basis. The problem always ends up being the there is no obvious way to get gas/cgen.c and bfd/elflink.c to #include the proper include/elf/<target>.h in order to pick up the reloc number.

If I'm missing something, then please let me know. Otherwise, I will likely pick a number from the list above and add a comment about conflicts with target specific reloc numbers.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]