This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Where does ld decide on which PLT implementation to pick?
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter at debian dot org>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 23:45:50 +0100
- Subject: Re: Where does ld decide on which PLT implementation to pick?
- References: <20061231132326.GA28083@country.grep.be> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20070102003258.GA4103@country.grep.be> <email@example.com>
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 07:49:28AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > Wouter Verhelst <email@example.com> writes:
> > > > The assembler is mostly done now, but I can't seem to be able to get the
> > > > linker to use the right PLT implementation. I don't have to write it
> > > > myself--the implementation which was written for the v4e ColdFire will
> > > > do nicely--but I need to figure out how to tell ld which implementation
> > > > it needs to use.
> > >
> > > See bfd/elf32-m68k.c:elf_m68k_get_plt_info.
> > Eh, this might be me, but I can't find that?
> Make sure you are working with the current development sources, not
> with released sources.
Ah, I see. Yes, that explains it; thanks.
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22