This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Where does ld decide on which PLT implementation to pick?
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter at grep dot be>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 01:32:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: Where does ld decide on which PLT implementation to pick?
- References: <20061231132326.GA28083@country.grep.be> <jek608xhvi.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> writes:
>
> > The assembler is mostly done now, but I can't seem to be able to get the
> > linker to use the right PLT implementation. I don't have to write it
> > myself--the implementation which was written for the v4e ColdFire will
> > do nicely--but I need to figure out how to tell ld which implementation
> > it needs to use.
>
> See bfd/elf32-m68k.c:elf_m68k_get_plt_info.
Eh, this might be me, but I can't find that?
--
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22