This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Where does ld decide on which PLT implementation to pick?
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Wouter Verhelst <wouter at debian dot org>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:25:05 +0100
- Subject: Re: Where does ld decide on which PLT implementation to pick?
- References: <20061231132326.GA28083@country.grep.be>
Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> writes:
> The assembler is mostly done now, but I can't seem to be able to get the
> linker to use the right PLT implementation. I don't have to write it
> myself--the implementation which was written for the v4e ColdFire will
> do nicely--but I need to figure out how to tell ld which implementation
> it needs to use.
See bfd/elf32-m68k.c:elf_m68k_get_plt_info.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."