This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Monday 23 October 2006 09:37, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > does it make sense at all to update ld/emultempl/elf32.em to verify that > > LD_RUN_PATH is a non-empty string ? cant seem to find any documentation > > on the subject other than "... the contents of the environment variable > > LD_RUN_PATH will be used if it is defined." > > Hmm, shouldn't empty LD_RUN_PATH be treated the same as one containing > just ":"? that is pretty much how it's handled currently ... except that in the case of ":", you force $PWD to be searched twice ... but that is the question i posed, do we ignore an empty LD_RUN_PATH (like Debian) or do we tweak the documentation to explicitly say it is allowed ? -mike
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |