This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Better checking of ISA/ASE/ABI options for MIPS gas
Eric Christopher wrote:
> >>And why change the table to include default extensions for the cpu?
> >To handle them the same way as the ISA. This is for ASEs which are
> >always implemented in that particular CPU.
> You'll need to look through the code and make sure we aren't depending on
> the value not being zero somewhere then.
I changed the test for is_isa in mips_cpu_info_from_isa() to
(flags & MIPS_CPU_IS_ISA). mips_cpu_info_from_isa() is the only user.
> To be honest I'd just prefer another field for "default ASEs".
a) This would bloat the table by another field to initialise.
b) There is no generic ISA with an ASE, both uses are mutually