This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: intl directory: gcc vs. src
- From: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
- To: drow at false dot org
- Cc: ian at airs dot com, binutils at sourceware dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: intl directory: gcc vs. src
> > Who maintains this automatic merge process?
> The man to ask about this is DJ Delorie. I'm not sure how much work it
> is on his part, though.
> Either way it would probably be best to do the initial sync by hand.
> And is it really plausible that nothing in src would need updating for
> the new intl?
> Daniel Jacobowitz
If something in src is going to need updating I don't know what it is.
I built binutils, gas, and gdb on HP-UX platforms using the gcc intl
directory and had no problems. When I built on Linux the intl directory
was basically ignored because it used the system gettext stuff.
I'm sure something might need updating after this change and I am
willing to try and fix anything I break, but I am not sure what other
testing I can do with the platforms I have available. Do you have any
suggestions as to what products or platforms might cause problems?
I did get one reply from a combined-tree user who said they used the gcc
version of intl when building things in a combined-tree.