This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: intl directory: gcc vs. src
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>
- Cc: ian at airs dot com, binutils at sourceware dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 18:39:00 -0400
- Subject: Re: intl directory: gcc vs. src
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <200605162236.PAA29498@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:36:22PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Can someone tell me about this automatic merge? I was going to submit a
> formal patch to change the contents of src/intl but it seems that if we
> have an automatic merge to copy libiberty from gcc to src, we could do
> the same for intl (and src/config.rhost) and then I wouldn't need to do
> any actual checkins for those changes. If we can do that then the only
> thing I would need to change by hand would be the intl text that is in
> the MAINTAINERS file.
> Who maintains this automatic merge process?
The man to ask about this is DJ Delorie. I'm not sure how much work it
is on his part, though.
Either way it would probably be best to do the initial sync by hand.
And is it really plausible that nothing in src would need updating for
the new intl?