This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] ARM Neon instruction set support

From: Julian Brown <julian at codesourcery dot com>
To: Julian Brown <julian at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, nickc at redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:55:12 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM Neon instruction set support
References: <442DD9E0.1090408@codesourcery.com> <200604010349.23269.paul@codesourcery.com> <44305E63.5000903@codesourcery.com>

Julian Brown wrote:

I've not considered in detail how that bit's going to be done yet, but I'll hold off on mainline submission until it's implemented, if that seems like a good idea. I think it should be possible without too much perturbation though, hopefully.

If it's not bad form, I'd like to retract the "holding off on mainline submission" part of the above -- this patch is blocking some other patches on mainline, so I'd like to commit it now, if possible.

If someone could review this (and the followup patch re: programmers syntax), I'd be grateful!

Cheers,

Julian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ARM Neon instruction set support
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [PATCH] ARM Neon programmers syntax
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- [PATCH] ARM Neon instruction set support
  - From: Julian Brown
- Re: [PATCH] ARM Neon instruction set support
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [PATCH] ARM Neon instruction set support
  - From: Julian Brown

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]