This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Results for 2.16.91 20050902 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: Christian Joensson <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>
- To: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:24:56 +0200
- Subject: Results for 2.16.91 20050902 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
(auroralinux corona + rathann's and rzm's FC3 updates)
binutils-2.16.91.0.2-4.sparc
bison-1.875c-2.sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch
expect-5.42.1-1.sparc
gcc-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc
gcc4-4.0.0-0.41.sparc.sparc
glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparcv9
glibc-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparc64
glibc-devel-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparc
glibc-devel-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparc64
glibc-headers-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparc
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-20sparc.sparc
gmp-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc
gmp-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc64
gmp-devel-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc
gmp-devel-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc64
kernel-2.6.11-1.1305sp1.sparc64
package kernel-devel is not installed
package kernel-smp is not installed
libgcc-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc
libgcc-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc64
libstdc++-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc
libstdc++-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc64
libstdc++-devel-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc
libstdc++-devel-3.4.3-22.sparc.sparc64
make-3.80-5.sparc
nptl-devel-2.3.5-0.fc3.1.sparcv9
tcl-8.4.7-2.sparc
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Sep 2 07:59:59 UTC 2005
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 33
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 93
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 255
# of expected failures 5
version: 2.16.91 20050902
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
--enable-64-bit-bfd
Counting all warnings,
there are 12 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
2 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/etc/standards.texi
Number of warning types:
10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
2 @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info;
reword to avoid that.